public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zsojka at seznam dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113518] New: ICE: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:18596 with atomic_fetch_or_explicit() on _BitInt()
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 06:05:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113518-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113518

            Bug ID: 113518
           Summary: ICE: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:18596 with
                    atomic_fetch_or_explicit() on _BitInt()
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: zsojka at seznam dot cz
                CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---
              Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
            Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Created attachment 57170
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57170&action=edit
reduced testcase (from gcc.target/i386/pr102566-2.c)

Compiler output:
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc testcase.c
In file included from testcase.c:1:
testcase.c: In function 'foo':
testcase.c:8:34: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.cc:18596
    8 |   atomic_fetch_or_explicit(&v, 1 << 31, memory_order_relaxed);
      |                                  ^
0x78cb81 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:18596
0x11a66a6 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:18085
0x11a62ef gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:18568
0x11bcae5 gimplify_modify_expr
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:6405
0x11a6489 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:17780
0x11b4b29 gimplify_target_expr
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:7399
0x11a66e0 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:18177
0x11a8b76 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:7480
0x11a74e0 gimplify_statement_list
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:2222
0x11a74e0 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:18225
0x11b4ced gimplify_target_expr
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:7393
0x11a66e0 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:18177
0x11a8b76 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:7480
0x11a9c79 gimplify_bind_expr
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:1614
0x11a71f7 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:17981
0x11bde24 gimplify_stmt(tree_node**, gimple**)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:7480
0x11bde24 gimplify_body(tree_node*, bool)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:19047
0x11be24a gimplify_function_tree(tree_node*)
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/gimplify.cc:19246
0xfcd037 cgraph_node::analyze()
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.cc:685
0xfcf957 analyze_functions
        /repo/gcc-trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.cc:1248
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.

$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-latest-amd64/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-trunk-r14-8284-20240119180625-g54519030b05-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/14.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /repo/gcc-trunk//configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-valgrind-annotations --disable-nls --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df,extra
--disable-bootstrap --with-cloog --with-ppl --with-isl
--build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-8284-20240119180625-g54519030b05-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.1 20240119 (experimental) (GCC)

             reply	other threads:[~2024-01-20  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-20  6:05 zsojka at seznam dot cz [this message]
2024-01-20  8:07 ` [Bug c/113518] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-22 14:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-23 18:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-23 19:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-113518-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).