From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1B0DB3858401; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:38:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1B0DB3858401
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706175504;
	bh=ASI/NkBSbKvNnltLlxWJ4zNKww6uFytrXcl7RYOPh4E=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=hPv22objTOYfNibWKIMlb1G36bkqGOYuhbZmSBCqigH75V+0KV0IXQoNK2312lZp8
	 h768dklKQSXETCZ79zDlooNDpYXG6oaWJgc+s3FUNhS0HIG6G9AUMmeGrkF/0J7U15
	 8uWZa+ihc6OEco/M8vysXXlSo/+OfgVH2/VWL1RY=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113522] std::swap cannot be called with explicit
 template argument std::array<int,3>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:38:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113522-4-TOharzyRHT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113522-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113522-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113522

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jiang An from comment #4)
> Hmm... currently it's specified in [algorithms.requirements] that
> > The well-formedness and behavior of a call to an algorithm with an expl=
icitly-specified template argument list is unspecified, except where explic=
itly stated otherwise.
>=20
> (Added by P0896R4 and amended by LWG3419.)
>=20
> Should open an LWG issue to specify similar things for std::swap?

Yes please. I thought we already had it, but when I went looking I only fou=
nd
that text in [algorithm.requirements].=