From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C87B53858C39; Fri,  8 Mar 2024 17:15:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C87B53858C39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709918149;
	bh=zKOPb8ba2em2UpYcuCn4X45tI2UdzVK0NTV3HVnaOz4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KgT33Wkd/8AUoqeunc77h4fefTaItU43K6AtzuoAb5Zn9zx2KFhGSw+y+T8H/joig
	 GKKsWvVZnf+aYy/RgufEK5kBha50AJIyIkIYdeGTPv4pbpNYo9L2n4po/z1txW/R4o
	 SsI+qfWXRuxeVAZE2TOZiunN0oxMaeIZrQI+yniE=
From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113542] [14 Regression] gcc.target/arm/bics_3.c
 regression after change for pr111267
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 17:15:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-113542-4-Jrxg4f8nql@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113542

Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Change the test slightly to avoid the insn matching issues.  This does leave
open the question of how best to optimize the slightly simpler sequences, w=
here
we could do even better than we do now, but that's an enhancement and not
appropriate for gcc-14.=