From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EA9F4385DC37; Thu,  1 Feb 2024 20:16:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EA9F4385DC37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706818576;
	bh=GlHJxThnBURuHy94KWjaUXmV0gh6ZMew82sxcldlKGA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YdLrQZhB0NYaQGmX9i+asYYj1fuZZDw+y8eDymgMH85DWfJitfsO/8TTEANOfWV4u
	 msP3xVCHjlVq5e5P4bRHI0DwnlOyIox+tif5c6yOnjmH7NKtqqX62w4O7BSZo9ecD2
	 sN3WPUPWw56O4F4V/HJKt1zIwiiuC64RLQeFstKg=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rust/113553] rust fails to build on sparc64-linux-gnu
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 20:16:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rust
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113553-4-eXFw9BJR7b@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113553-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113553

--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> > oh look at this a memset issue on sparc glibc:
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31068 .
>=20
> Hmm, but this would be sparc32. Are you sure that this applies here?

Hmm, that is true. Still that does seem like memset is not working correctl=
y.
Someone will need to debug memset because this code looks correct otherwise=
.=