From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 600D43858C54; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:45:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 600D43858C54
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706021155;
	bh=EWY6cIrc+8uPQ+u9nvbMl6ZT78BgavTYobXMjSF3t58=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=yy5mNLKBYvxPgvgnF/8hO8Tx4gKVeLdoeuPC1i0gxsZZeetr7WFEsibU2bQxs05dI
	 m/EmhOb+MGoMyTTDwqkid5yuGob/ldTiWDVAnbuv6GAEwY3BLFCC4HQWWdclJAmkNK
	 QvwP2cStc4HbNZG9imO4vQ1MwWvPb45N1LE2EgYw=
From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/113558] [14 regression]
 gcc.dg/vect/vect-outer-4c-big-array.c etc. FAIL
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:45:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-113558-4-gvYfrWkOUB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113558-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113558-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113558

--- Comment #2 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 57195
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D57195&action=3Dedit
Tentative patch

Ah, it looks like nothing is being vectorized at all and the second check j=
ust
happened to match as part of the unsuccessful vectorization attempt.  It wo=
uld
seem that we need the same condition as for the first check as well.

Would you mind giving the attached patch a try?  I ran it on riscv and powe=
r10
so far, x86 and aarch64 are still in progress.=