From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 635493858C41; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 07:34:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 635493858C41 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1706600054; bh=/S8XQr61kH8eC0I7rgOUuuBYMm66IVHJjIO4dMLbmjM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NBFhaQMSITIGGQ1nQ/qcppn4Akw8y2SdLfhfxAa13XxFf/EJkwbuOCrZeEqvPfUY/ RSTxzk+67ICH8GjG17siWjUILOQ34efEwbmaKvZtqhV/dLJQpXHUTOqcLjZg3qOJgL 5vs2oYR3PKj9Ye9L4cEQr513jh00jdLNS1y2+0iU= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/113562] [14 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54796.c Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 07:34:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113562 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Just to put it somewhere I ran dwlocstat on cc1plus before/after the > offending change and it looks almost the same. We go from >=20 > cov% samples cumul > 0..10 1280217/38% 1280217/38% > 11..20 55668/1% 1335885/40% > 21..30 68004/2% 1403889/42% > 31..40 70774/2% 1474663/44% > 41..50 75554/2% 1550217/46% > 51..60 91816/2% 1642033/49% > 61..70 101139/3% 1743172/52% > 71..80 135281/4% 1878453/56% > 81..90 198470/5% 2076923/62% > 91..100 1233822/37% 3310745/100% >=20 > to >=20 > cov% samples cumul > 0..10 1280197/38% 1280197/38% > 11..20 55669/1% 1335866/40% > 21..30 68014/2% 1403880/42% > 31..40 70773/2% 1474653/44% > 41..50 75542/2% 1550195/46% > 51..60 91800/2% 1641995/49% > 61..70 101133/3% 1743128/52% > 71..80 135259/4% 1878387/56% > 81..90 198496/5% 2076883/62% > 91..100 1233844/37% 3310727/100% And with up-to-date elfutils to avoid some DWARF5 issues cov% samples cumul 0..10 1280347/38% 1280347/38% 11..20 55720/1% 1336067/40% 21..30 68040/2% 1404107/42% 31..40 70805/2% 1474912/44% 41..50 75585/2% 1550497/46% 51..60 91850/2% 1642347/49% 61..70 101224/3% 1743571/52% 71..80 135406/4% 1878977/56% 81..90 198509/5% 2077486/62% 91..100 1233880/37% 3311366/100% to cov% samples cumul 0..10 1280327/38% 1280327/38% 11..20 55721/1% 1336048/40% 21..30 68050/2% 1404098/42% 31..40 70804/2% 1474902/44% 41..50 75573/2% 1550475/46% 51..60 91834/2% 1642309/49% 61..70 101218/3% 1743527/52% 71..80 135384/4% 1878911/56% 81..90 198535/5% 2077446/62% 91..100 1233902/37% 3311348/100%=