From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C71C83858D38; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 06:52:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C71C83858D38 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1706079171; bh=PSBFmP4OvrNbD/fOWa2bjMZQIZj2zrs1EKqMRiI0rVY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WLWIvwntvlLCoOP7WHZ73/inAokiw8hpFHGH7ISFZzc8UbKecsN/fbdVPoL1sivC0 UguQwoGsMao4X/J0TM+7JGyayGQITAfe/kHKT0cxq85laP4FW2LHBbRSG8s4VPazoX w3GYjxXdVxtMMY2xzPh5yXcUU8WWdMcTQM6/YwBc= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/113574] wrong code with shift and _BitInt(1) at any opt level Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 06:52:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113574 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Note I was thinking I might hit this with 1 sized bit field but that seems = to work: ``` struct f { unsigned ub1:1; }t; void foo(unsigned short ub16) { t.ub1 =3D (ub16 << 2); } int main(void) { unsigned short t2 =3D 0xfef1; foo(t2); if (t.ub1) __builtin_abort(); return 0; } ```=