From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B05EA385843B; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:53:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B05EA385843B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706086416;
	bh=6+LGzUS3Wj8ys7VAA7+rZPGdEGN8q3nY8ceqYUSLNBA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=nfIAqHOg37lPkxE0g7gEXZvEPZa1AKxrY0aMIty7q6sNUznmvWUU2MIkxp3vRewQ/
	 hE5M045JE4z6cwo1OSS8q2A+Os5Y7xX8v2uIZ4r8UBe/vR/swtqDrjO5Z6r0KC97uN
	 8SL2Mk2NNn7WL1Cy/21w33KWsOgQ9l1WXuDNa8f0=
From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/113575] [14 Regression] memory hog building insn-opinit.o
 (i686-linux-gnu -> riscv64-linux-gnu)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:53:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, memory-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-113575-4-ZXSWhmKzCf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113575-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113575-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113575

Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, this is a known issue and it's due to our large number of patterns.=20
Contrary to insn-emit insn-opinit cannot be split that easily.  It would
probably need a tree-like approach or similar.
I wouldn't see this as a regression in the classical sense as we just have =
many
more patterns because of the vector extension.
Is increasing the available memory an option in the meantime or does this
urgently require fixing?=