public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:52:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-113576-4-tDOJ2Y1IrA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-113576-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #8)
> maybe
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> index 1fd957288d4..6d321f9baef 100644
> --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc
> +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> @@ -8035,6 +8035,9 @@ native_encode_vector_part (const_tree expr, unsigned
> char *ptr, int len,
> unsigned int extract_elts = extract_bytes * elts_per_byte;
> for (unsigned int i = 0; i < extract_elts; ++i)
> {
> + /* Don't encode any bit beyond the range of the vector. */
> + if (first_elt + i > count)
> + break;
Hmm. I think that VECTOR_CST_ELT should have ICEd for out-of-bound
element queries but it seems to make up elements for us here. Richard?
But yes, we do
unsigned int extract_elts = extract_bytes * elts_per_byte;
and since native_encode_* and native_interpret_* operate on bytes we have
difficulties dealing with bit-precision entities with padding.
There's either the possibility to fail encoding when that happens or
do something else. Note that RTL expansion will do
case VECTOR_CST:
{
tree tmp = NULL_TREE;
if (VECTOR_MODE_P (mode))
return const_vector_from_tree (exp);
scalar_int_mode int_mode;
if (is_int_mode (mode, &int_mode))
{
tree type_for_mode = lang_hooks.types.type_for_mode (int_mode, 1);
if (type_for_mode)
tmp = fold_unary_loc (loc, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR,
type_for_mode, exp);
which I think should always succeed (otherwise it falls back to expanding
a CTOR). That means failing to encode/interpret might get into
store_constructor which I think will zero a register destination and thus
fill padding with zeros.
So yeah, something like this looks OK, but I think instead of only
testing against 'count' we should also test against TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS
(that might be variable, so with known_gt).
Would be interesting to see whether this fixes the issue without the
now installed patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 10:05 [Bug tree-optimization/113576] New: " liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 10:07 ` [Bug tree-optimization/113576] " liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 12:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 13:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 13:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 1:03 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 6:28 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 7:02 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 7:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 8:34 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 8:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-01-25 9:15 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-01-25 9:26 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 10:09 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 10:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 12:24 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 13:03 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 13:28 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 14:12 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-01-26 2:24 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 3:12 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 5:43 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-29 17:28 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-29 18:31 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-30 3:29 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-30 7:46 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-30 8:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-30 8:34 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-30 8:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-30 10:12 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-30 10:39 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2024-02-01 8:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-01 9:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-01 9:18 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-01 10:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-07 15:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-08 1:18 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-08 1:58 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-08 4:22 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-08 7:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-08 10:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-08 10:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-08 14:58 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-08 15:07 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-08 15:19 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 12:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 12:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 13:48 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-02-14 13:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 13:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 14:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 14:31 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-02-14 14:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 15:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-14 15:26 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-02-14 20:18 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2024-02-18 2:10 ` liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-113576-4-tDOJ2Y1IrA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).