From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 81C8B3857707; Thu,  7 Mar 2024 14:20:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 81C8B3857707
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709821247;
	bh=VwUYWcU6txML0J5LE3GHLsSqMt691d64ji2Ny5WqiGw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=aOEeYohbtG2WczmcJ1RBF0UnWRgi4Cb/6yBjgclEkY2H5Q4+GcEVh86N47/9mqtsL
	 xmlkRC9D2DhGcHrdJh60QkuWw3Pm9WDI/kH3rOWExiYq9theYMoyJT45x0Tevty5Wd
	 UKLB6GaycBjkVhaQp0f9+sfWuGuktPuLFSTdYSRg=
From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/113617] [14 Regression] Symbol ... referenced
 in section `.data.rel.ro.local' of ...: defined in discarded section ...
 since r14-4944
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 14:20:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: link-failure, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113617-4-byBdWdzQ1x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113617-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113617-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113617

--- Comment #25 from Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org>=
 ---
Yes, that test in check_effective_target_shared actually works with C, but =
not
with C++, because:

Undefined symbols for architecture arm64:
  "__Z3foov", referenced from:
      __Z3bazv in ccCj5plO.o

Why have we not seen it before? Because most of the use of that check is in=
 {
dg-require-effective-target shared } so we're effectively skipping tests, a=
nd
that is silent.

As far as I can tell, your addition is the first time { target shared } is =
used
as a conditional in something like { dg-additional-options } in the C++
testsuite.

Thanks for helping me figuring it out, that's definitely at least a darwin
issue, which I'll take care of.=