From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DE3A63858299; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:49:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DE3A63858299
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706626162;
	bh=fEPpL0TtYKDnVBIkhMU69Y28PYPtgtRvD0yY5knEniQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=EuqZOYkyX2kYVY2twR+wrKOi9ti+4VT32726fb7yczovxpyjmpQfGMpHQibGDU5Wd
	 HKtVhTg5PIwkHO8CHYMNbmr+nlIwPK/47PTN0AkMU+GmEn9pLE8iirnccd2GYn/rQY
	 6EKHgLVQsvJFuVWgtbMePaO7LJuNZRNoEyqIeL9M=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113622] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE with
 vectors in named registers
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:49:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113622-4-KSegkvYmgu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113622

--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113622
>=20
> --- Comment #22 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> On x86_64:
>=20
> $ cat t.c
> typedef float __attribute__ ((vector_size (16))) vec;
> typedef int __attribute__ ((vector_size (16))) ivec;
> register vec a asm("xmm0"), b asm("xmm1");
> register ivec c asm("xmm2");
>=20
> void
> test (void)
> {
>   for (int i =3D 0; i < 4; i++)
>     c[i] =3D a[i] < b[i] ? -1 : 1;
> }
> $ gcc/cc1 -msse2 t.c -O2 -fno-vect-cost-model -nostdinc -ffixed-xmm{0,1,2}
> t.c: In function 'test':
> t.c:7:1: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.cc:=
9139
>     7 | test (void)
>       | ^~~~
> 0x10e6d6e expand_expr_addr_expr_1
>         ../../gcc/gcc/expr.cc:9139
> 0x10e76e2 expand_expr_addr_expr
>         ../../gcc/gcc/expr.cc:9252
> 0x10f73a7 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
>         ../../gcc/gcc/expr.cc:12585
> 0x10e7dc8 expand_expr_real(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_mod=
ifier,
> rtx_def**, bool)
>         ../../gcc/gcc/expr.cc:9440
> 0xef7346 expand_expr(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_modifier)
>         ../../gcc/gcc/expr.h:316
> 0x10e91fa expand_expr_real_2(separate_ops*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> expand_modifier)
>         ../../gcc/gcc/expr.cc:9762
> 0x10ef77d expand_expr_real_gassign(gassign*, rtx_def*, machine_mode,
> expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
>         ../../gcc/gcc/expr.cc:11096
> 0xf2db31 expand_gimple_stmt_1
>         ../../gcc/gcc/cfgexpand.cc:4010
> 0xf2ddd4 expand_gimple_stmt
>         ../../gcc/gcc/cfgexpand.cc:4071
> 0xf36844 expand_gimple_basic_block
>         ../../gcc/gcc/cfgexpand.cc:6127
> 0xf38ff8 execute
>         ../../gcc/gcc/cfgexpand.cc:6866
>=20
> Should I open a new ticket or add back 14 Regression to the subject?

Please open a new ticked - this seems to be another vectorizer issue.

We end up with the invalid

_28 =3D (sizetype) &a;=