From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A087538582B6; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 06:37:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A087538582B6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1706596645; bh=7j2MbMj8E/FlMoGU/msYwepNbzhjykLP7f+FKRU27p0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wZIKHkzl14GfR6X1yFYJZuHq9uQb67I0xWCMPRO2OtdSsKYzRwPy9MeoFPkN+4U98 LivaQgPCZ8VcFYdJiRaiJuiHsGF5gyoYWkWGDleahp1yc3g/MJhwnhGtgOfItt6a6N 02K9uotz4A0zPC4PIRplS7qqKoaHHYKWS9v8ukXc= From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113652] Failed bootstrap on ppc unrecognized opcode: `lfiwzx' with -mcpu=7450 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 06:37:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113652 --- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin --- In gcc, lfiwzx is guarded with TARGET_LFIWZX =3D> TARGET_POPCNTD (ISA2.06),= while -mvsx will guarantee TARGET_POPCNTD (ISA_2_6_MASKS_SERVER) set, so it consi= ders lfiwzx is supported. IMHO the underlying philosophy is that having the capability of vsx the supported ISA level is at least 2.06, lfiwzx is suppo= rted from 2.06, so it's supported. But binutils seems not to follow it: {"xvadddp", XX3(60,96), XX3_MASK, PPCVSX, PPCVLE, {XT= 6, XA6, XB6}}, {"lfiwzx", X(31,887), X_MASK, POWER7|PPCA2, 0, {FR= T, RA0, RB}}, Both are guarded with different masks and apparently PPCVSX doesn't enable POWER7. Hi Alan and Peter, I wonder if assembler can enable POWER7 when PPCVSX gets enabled like what = gcc adopts now?=