From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1FC5F3858407; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 06:18:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1FC5F3858407 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1706595513; bh=mlQyLStv8qcidB9FGjxV++MoSl1l0XfEKjbxKcYqDrw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=J7WieM7BoQ8OcVBhbQHVKL6jmoednpOcGhM4RwjymYAydK4OUnY2B1RcOritVQL8U XtF0dgTre3u0BfengiQ2LMjzBTIITJuKQI4/9i5fFrDl8qBDJgaRk0goyvu3EkqTN+ N69ZQlFxU0JSNDmnqzEL9kOPs2zY1pYLv5WWihjg= From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113652] Failed bootstrap on ppc unrecognized opcode: `lfiwzx' with -mcpu=7450 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 06:18:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113652 --- Comment #10 from Sam James --- (In reality, I think it is a regression, given: a) it regresses non-release checking (which we sometimes use even for relea= sed versions, it's opt-in though); b) it blocks further testing with GCC 14 but I understand the argument that if a release were made with it, it would= n't be the end of the world by itself and it only affects a specific configuration.)=