From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3E62F3858420; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:27:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3E62F3858420
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706689640;
	bh=LjxeOx8F1P93IVVWtRuJOiCXWavjuDLmCHuIPfDpYVk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=EMOKGKrtcy3MJ/Pp8mAkYHUmeOESkHe6+K0L4GUbzcz4EYjDqZCTjrYXJJPoM5NEW
	 n/1JawUPZ/DR8ehMZG+5Mbe8o3p2p5L9VmHyiqQ0sbNK1yFHe0g+WcMEpurk0/nrZu
	 DT4ry7EtJLrt1NUMymwS2WQijMF/sc8DkFFLa0jk=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113677] Missing `VEC_PERM_EXPR <{a, CST},
 CST, {0, 1, 2, ...}>` optimization
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:27:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-113677-4-lhDD4QMEL1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113677

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-01-31
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yeah, most of the code in forwprop/match doesn't deal with the "new" permut=
es
where the result isn't the same length as the inputs.=