From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5FD993858402; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 01:47:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5FD993858402
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706665634;
	bh=tZPc4Z2uTM+7itz0ePDN0Cwih2FpSCsLW64yTaHfXU8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tdSfF3+bo9GGZm8uhQN0v8mPgRfC8B0C31e0a94xQXxk9P4ZuQiEnjfD8c3tNcOhA
	 K96XpQabxDLo5KGFScatUD++2ObIDrY8g0BUGUpcMjKMeAlY26Ef0yg9Slp7JW38a1
	 jG/+WpvGDYVcRt8EpPqYy6pSl0RDwHk+UWduHFGY=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113677] Missing `VEC_PERM_EXPR <{a, CST},
 CST, {0, 1, 2, ...}>` optimization
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 01:47:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget
Message-ID: <bug-113677-4-qkJpPNce6k@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113677-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113677

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|                            |x86_64

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I should note I noticed this while working on adding V4QI support for aarch=
64
but it is definite a generic issue.=