From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3E6AF3858291; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 18:58:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3E6AF3858291 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1707245881; bh=mrP7iLDmaOIdV2gc59h7ZRAHOgnTX4e8HAvlqKWJgEY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sHmRqBvgs1N/jyuTiQ8Ds68gs1DdC6plgGPBHsASPxYBlbhlet8y90DWMRkiue/KR LP8BNofS/NxtJmf4M65Ucg5BXKhhiwBZSfyn7IIvm5/UIwsuUclnobxGm4o4RpfHVn JkhQUoPw8jmcWQY+MT6Tj7UHgz9GHLhthM4elpEY= From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548 Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 18:58:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113689 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) >=20 > Just the second hunk. I think with sorry call the compilation fails, so = what > you actually emit doesn't matter (one can see it with -pipe, sure). Done.=