From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id F0AC03870892; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 16:27:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F0AC03870892 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1706804839; bh=7dykzYhGhFXeM7yZPE14FsDlucqoHhB3psZh1pZuTaY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=S+SZQSpJHJirTN4SfzXLvQEPl/LycSfnwC6z4UO6KDJKPptMAy+B/fX/zngcZjRVV M4Txfp7/ZcoOivFufLEzs9Gbz4hyTJcpvAzcQkyjIE8vSPLFO5Y3sLTKA3Y6FqvnfB Sv7W3rzsPAdIthdf98NvNf+5au68iz4c1zjbxZ2Q= From: "youremailsarecrap at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113700] libgcc_s does not include symbols for _Float16 and __bf16 on Solaris/Illumos even though gcc generates code for _Float16 and __bf16 Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 16:27:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: youremailsarecrap at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113700 --- Comment #4 from Niclas Rosenvik --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #3) > (In reply to Niclas Rosenvik from comment #2) > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > > >I tried to add the gcc12 and up parts of > > >=20 > > > It is correct except it should just use GCC 14 I think. > >=20 > > I forgot to mention that the problem with _Float16 aka > > __extendhfdf2 has happened on gcc12 as well as gcc14. > > If it was possible to not just choose one version of > > gcc then I would have marked gcc12 to 14. >=20 > You cannot add symbols to symbol versions of older releases retroactively. > Since those versions (GCC_12.0.0, GCC_13.0.0, GCC_14.0.0) were overlooked > before the respective releases, all symbols that are listed in > i386/libgcc-glibc.ver in those versions need to be added to > i386/libgcc-sol2.ver in version GCC_14.0.0 (after verifying that they are > actually defined on Solaris/x86). OK, thanks for explaining.=