From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D9BE73858D3C; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 05:34:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D9BE73858D3C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1707024894; bh=E7CsIjHZIoRB9NMNchOA0iKPi+920wt4llgVKOyCm3I=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=G+mO41DumGz0HSGXRdKBjQXSSiL87Bef9/wk31jWlVNQ5mgAiFMJwLfB8YiP9agPL sr4wfvqCFf2hf3RRVK5BCZiM0E1LN4+6HNuzZP2p+nkCpCeH3xbo1kQpMniDi9bFOT vHN7b4Z6iny4oNrBS5utnDADyp2lITmR6DLk+mAE= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113714] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination: -(w+d-x)-x => -(w+d) Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2024 05:34:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113714 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail|11.1.0 | --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, for x86_64, it regressed in GCC 11 but for aarch64, it seems like it is only a regression on the trunk ...=