From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 252333858C98; Mon,  5 Feb 2024 07:32:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 252333858C98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707118370;
	bh=EI6Cznv322lhtQ4kDWqnFNpJu5DsA4OA0EyguN8zo6k=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YSzqOlUFLf2S6Vs6x9jDbg9JGZCNbaQ4GpMkv/K9Ig1YNIEyOtm7/kvT356R5/lsc
	 UEcNFniZU3UyBpR0lyZZTxjlbWzpnOpngOMr2RI9EyHgCfjBAkPGaZ13Tfy1tt0Qhw
	 G6qFq1cVznM26q7V4aTGwSFEKyh5Q/T687a5mmhc=
From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/113750] [14 Regression] ICE in vect building
 gcc/m2/gm2-libs/NumberIO.mod since r14-8769-g64b0130bb6702c
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 07:32:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-113750-4-vD40PDALB2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113750-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113750-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113750

Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|gaius at gcc dot gnu.org           |tnfchris at gcc dot=
 gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I assumed that labels could only still be present at this point of the CFG =
only
to deal with control flow from e.g. switch statements which we reject earli=
er.

It seems that these labels are an artifact of the front-end and are dead by=
 the
time they reach vect but still there in the IL.

I'll add a quick check for if they are and can set the stores before the la=
st
non-debug statement.

Testing a patch.=