From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4EF4A3858C2C; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 01:54:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4EF4A3858C2C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1707789249; bh=DWy0iMoTZ3Td2EktCTsKBftIYERTEVozhR1FGsSwUNk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=caLx2ILnPms1e13v080ZV9SIa4kLZ/0RDK41rOKrnzRFJ1vWcuIhC9KRK7tsZaNj/ enltpekHHze0cq1Ki4DzyBWzveS7MSu+9NHpfQN5LFJKzSnZrEjXp2hF9S/3qknFsT YldgBZCanebBEnoF2tDu0W+JSjzGZuQaEc9gp/iI= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/113760] [DR1693] gcc rejects valid empty-declaration in pedantic mode Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 01:54:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113760 --- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek --- My current patch appears to handle that correctly: $ ./cc1plus -quiet q.C -pedantic-errors -std=3Dc++98 -Wno-error=3Dextra-semi q.C:3:3: warning: extra =E2=80=98;=E2=80=99 outside of a function only allo= wed in C++11 [-Wextra-semi] 3 | };; | ^ | - I'll add a test for that combination.=