From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 181E03858C2D; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:29:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 181E03858C2D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1707773354; bh=ZCydjbXVvWV0WtzgnWS3bKyLD4JmZnrYm8dXZ8+nwGs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TA4RPH3orSAtorwQDr6SovuIWb1/7Yjh8G2o//4loJSymRiQ/K8K2ma3Qd4t9c0wg 30CBDfRk/WsKb3j2zCt+AGIbue48ysABy54/NT+vU4XAbjquqQJWPaG/xnWp4lRZbu 25mmCZvtr1hxtOYvtzq3qKd5jVOLbZFugvfoqm7k= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/113760] [DR1693] gcc rejects valid empty-declaration in pedantic mode Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:29:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113760 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek --- And we should also warn in C++98 with -Wc++11-extensions for an extra ';' outside of a function I suppose...=