From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 90D453858C41; Mon,  5 Feb 2024 07:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 90D453858C41
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707117838;
	bh=Sw9izLC1tcq8qedQYm7Hn0xzAmIWkqmZVAhOgHgJIE0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=pm7y4ADQ5o/hs25nZLBFwwESwrUtJlTcx23vixNHlNUWd2Idf3M6iSqXvnnDeU6nm
	 2TVYZ4baHw3M67yok7BAOL4PpaVW+583Q9uCpqpML/iwTfvF9Sc+ww0J7G/UrrPbOr
	 IbQuSh/oEVh1ewWjUb9Z2lZ9dW3o21TPfUI6MYew=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/113760] gcc rejects valid empty-declaration in pedantic
 mode
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 07:23:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113760-4-ycaL8aV1Rt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113760-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113760-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113760

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>From JDK bug report:
> It looks like it only removed
> the warnings for empty declarations at namespace scope. I couldn't find
> anything for other cases, including empty class member declarations.

Yes because the C++ defect report was only for `Spurious semicolons at
namespace scope should be allowed`.  See
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#569 .


```
struct f
{
  int t;  ;
};
```

Is not allowed by the C++ standard currently and is a GCC extension, maybe =
it
should have a seperate flag to control that but I am not 100% sure.=