public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113764] [X86] Generates lzcnt when bsr is sufficient Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 21:58:02 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-113764-4-q8ymgUmjkO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-113764-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113764 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- It is far more complicated than this. When TARGET_LZCNT is on, CLZ_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO is 2 and already in GIMPLE opts can use the fact that it has particular behavior on zero argument. Before my _BitInt changes for clz/ctz etc., there was no way to differentiate it in GIMPLE except for builtin (which had UB at zero) vs. ifn (which had it depending on C?Z_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO). Now even ifn can be UB at zero (single argument) or well defined (two). But still on RTL we have just one thing, CLZ or CTZ rtxes which honor C?Z_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO for the particular mode. So, I think having at least in one function some lzcnt and some bsr insns wouldn't be possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 21:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-02-05 11:38 [Bug target/113764] New: " chfast at gmail dot com 2024-02-08 0:35 ` [Bug target/113764] " roger at nextmovesoftware dot com 2024-02-09 18:35 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com 2024-02-09 21:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-02-11 11:34 ` [Bug target/113764] [X86] __builtin_clz generates " roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-113764-4-q8ymgUmjkO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).