From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2F8813858C39; Thu,  8 Feb 2024 14:18:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2F8813858C39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707401905;
	bh=WX6TUj6FETnL7q6ZsCTM+lb/8e6ydvBTH8RgIR0qD/o=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=yhwplagCeXEK4jx2MuECWoVmqgtHT0pBNQbYUHtw26F7gyPTujQjRT/ziEIWiXdmY
	 reZgrkC0fj7fsCtR/k2FOXnAPGHLp82cr1CX4WnRnbwfvbkWcxwR+a19dL3WdTk0vT
	 ukTEZfsLNLJm/8dTF2dUVUfC/Kj0VJukQo7DNMSQ=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113774] wrong code with _BitInt() arithmetics
 at -O2
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 14:18:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113774-4-JyhfDRgCce@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113774-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113774-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113774

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Thanks.
> The #c5 reduced testcase started to be miscompiled with
> r9-398-g6b9fc1782effc67dd9f6def16207653d79647553
> Perhaps we should move that to a separate bug so that it can be marked
> [11/12/13/14 Regression] and leave this just for the bitint lowering
> enhancements not to emit clearly always true or always false conditions if
> possible.

PR113831=