From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DD68C3858D20; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:27:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DD68C3858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708504061;
	bh=0To+iIgGmCVZVFr442AvF5Uy9PALGX7ogsUfBZ7tKnA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=i6UKptpUoKaRsBdE1HeNTqAmj8pACRxGX0rNFvx7FTuTc5aTTUYJjjUTlLL1DCu2M
	 MQLWdzGjDi5QIMZhWbZZ+wgY1pjvNx0V3HHFixuzJLRZIacx155BDuz7XSRmG9O9hj
	 ZNOvnt7mDHls3KlXfGwpgKIAuF+gtAknYYl2sFAo=
From: "de34 at live dot cn" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113782] constexpr on std::initializer_list, std::pair
 and std::tuple is non-conforming for C++11
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:27:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: de34 at live dot cn
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-113782-4-HcdY0fBm5x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113782

Jiang An <de34 at live dot cn> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |de34 at live dot cn

--- Comment #1 from Jiang An <de34 at live dot cn> ---
May be related to PR 102916. Is there any policy for "backporting" constexp=
r?=