From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 276553858D33; Tue,  6 Feb 2024 16:20:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 276553858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707236453;
	bh=U242RuXe0kA+NPgmSuB6qeyS/lOd+0rjhcIoCxqIJLo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ToM4q33Xvm91vP1MWz/NbfrgUxIABIomUtR83AR/D5WwZwiLcP/+pKWqMgPfG/Hvb
	 Je5BLsEqokclVBZ/oJp112js++8/mnT8ZTwqz6OqFkxUDtHqgp5OpJyqTX5g55jmNm
	 rTdNg+V5r/xzHrOIHRzLUbbbMDEWSSSb97pg5jqo=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/113786] cppcheck: return value from find_if not properly
 checked ?
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 16:20:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: blocked bug_severity keywords
Message-ID: <bug-113786-4-ugWAgxAtGJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113786-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113786-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113786

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |87403
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
           Keywords|                            |diagnostic

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I guess we could put [[gnu::returns_nonnull]] on those functions, but it
wouldn't help due to PR 86879.

This feels like something that belongs to static analysers, not a compiler.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D87403
[Bug 87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning=