From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E089B3858D33; Tue,  6 Feb 2024 14:23:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E089B3858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707229412;
	bh=hCuZJ1ZfShLU8ssJzbxo+QfNdPbPPtXH/3Cd67DCPrM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ukFK/3YoEy52w0m5Z+UzT+2hJs1bLX+TKaFn0QtjqT/xcIZ3Hu142MHdgSWqW2wwg
	 Z2D8iJL5CDS0sfQFv5vhVyE9md8kbmLufEB8YnsutEnz+P6RnkIJuMnnYuWSJRXuDV
	 6IqnedtgYW2iIhQzpf4FVA1fHqd1hAN9HnevXN3A=
From: "acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/113787] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at
 -O with ipa-modref on aarch64
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:23:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113787-4-cVQaYfhI2B@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113787-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113787-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113787

--- Comment #7 from Alex Coplan <acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> > My bisection points to r12-5915-ge93809f62363ba4b233858005aef652fb550e8=
96
>=20
> Which means it is related to bug 110702 .
>=20
> Again try -fno-ivopts . I suspect ivopts is producing some odd ir that is
> confusing modref here.

Yeah, it seems -fno-ivopts makes the execution test pass too (so -O
-fno-ivopts).=