From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 69F89385840F; Thu,  8 Feb 2024 09:13:37 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 69F89385840F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707383617;
	bh=IZpD0jbg8reL82TNBneE5O5uohV6E8k3SYzPNT4MwZA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mCdmEDOn84sMvgNLKpcU71AFrKzj2rbuwuGUhjIgIchrHTolf4oPm+CmOEAO5PeL6
	 kKUK2oMfGLmb1CggJGwYn353lS/g5tvi2OKxuVUKRkBdpU57lLoHTcHM4lKN+gjF0H
	 ThcDdlsATP8lMGdioW36uSOT4jQu4x/P2JIzaJNE=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/113811] std::rotate does 64-bit signed division
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 09:13:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113811-4-j1Rb2iJiYu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113811-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113811-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113811

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In case __n is the minimum signed integer and __k is -1 the division would =
also
trap ;)  So yes, they should be unsigned.=