From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AC3393858C78; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 04:28:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AC3393858C78 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1707452887; bh=obl8sTOGgn4SOlMsXPDp4Wek3DiFWaZapXZkr7UXQgQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=n8IjI2UDNHM78U7eIoM7n51jyTMBxWUvKhAKnJctstmJABAliENxGitNxH6cAXz9A tCza864JE/7B6LruIcvSSDbNOU0Ub4FKyA1L3u2NCI5w9M/jsyYrHsAdqskS5MDw/b rgi2VKeq/BEGPjkikE1SMoPSgTYwf8XEq2Te51t4= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113827] MrBayes benchmark redundant load Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 04:28:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113827 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2024-02-09 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >a redundant scalar load=20 I don't see any redundant load in that loop. ``` L3: movq (%rdi), %rax ;; load a[i] from rdi vmovups (%rax), %xmm1 ;; load rax[0-3] into vector vdivps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm1 ;; divide vmovups %xmm1, (%rax) ;; store result back into rax[0-3] addq $16, %rax ;; add 4*4 to rax movq %rax, (%rdi) ;; store rax back into rdi addq $8, %rdi ;; add 8 to rdi cmpq %rdi, %rdx jne .L3 ;; compare and loop back ``` That is a[i] is different between each iterations. Maybe you reduced this code too much?=