From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7EB763858C60; Thu,  8 Feb 2024 13:01:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7EB763858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707397305;
	bh=AMBUzcIwMPvu+Tyeo//GiO9a+g9272rT6d1pO/Em58A=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=K3GvlTBHkedgohMovjomM/GHEGhCPxnWNg13TsRxqYNjFIpzSC5Ra5S20YTeqJUNp
	 9eKwBdCWJG4sm57UzXBSNNAmfA1+kO55buXZJjd/iG8I4kK70wcSjQOrSquRohoSOz
	 a4sUdowK7H+BKBO5SdIlPgS0wFF1leipolliKjVU=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/113830] GCC accepts invalid code when instantiating the
 local class inside a function
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 13:01:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-113830-4-3nsj6RF986@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113830-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113830-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113830

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-02-08
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Bo Wang from comment #0)
> It appears that if a template function has an internally defined local cl=
ass
> that uses a dependent name in its member function, it can cause the
> compiler's name-binding process to get into trouble.

Or GCC just doesn't check the default argument because it's not used?=