From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7C41A3858D39; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:45:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7C41A3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707731108;
	bh=dtCdu84BweqdqEbUUWlCvty8ocACeQbQ7iAok0bsAk4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=M1vysUeS18jLUM/DpE4lLnC2dZuAz6Hid9wycO9/giNmOD+nVKNyGbL6g8uikWwz1
	 oegpHlV6Kf8SXqrp/mD9jLixsl+gf7YPN8YOxFtXRaS8xHHjiEd0yvLX4JRyIkfg+x
	 1zASAj6aONh7qatxiRyh9jY6dfXJ95YENH1mrePI=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113847] [14 Regression] 10% slowdown of 462.libquantum
 on AMD Ryzen 7700X and Ryzen 7900X
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:45:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to cf_reconfirmed_on
 everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-113847-4-0iqd6l3a01@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113847

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |rguenth at gcc dot =
gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-02-12
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I will try to investigate.  Note this was a correctness fix, it could be
relaxed a tiny bit but behavior will then depend on the order of processing=
 of
blocks not ordered by RPO.=