public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/113847] [14 Regression] 10% slowdown of 462.libquantum on AMD Ryzen 7700X and Ryzen 7900X Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 13:18:30 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-113847-4-yOqRtXs2oO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-113847-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113847 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I can't confirm a regression (testing r14-8925-g1e3f78dbb328a2 with the offending rev reverted vs bare). 462.libquantum 20720 61.9 335 S 20720 62.6 331 * 462.libquantum 20720 62.2 333 * 20720 61.9 335 S 462.libquantum 20720 62.4 332 S 20720 62.7 330 S so the "best" run with the change is faster than the best run with it reverted while the worst runs are the same. There's only code-gen changes in quantum_bmeasure.part.0 and we can see it's likely {component_ref<node>,mem_ref<0B>,reg_3(D)}@.MEM_166 (0030) vs {component_ref<hash>,mem_ref<0B>,reg_3(D)}@.MEM_9 (0022) where once the size is 256 and once 64. The types are <record_type 0x7ffff6a753f0 quantum_reg BLK size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6c29138 type <integer_type 0x7ffff6c250a8 bitsizetype> constant 256> unit-size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6c29228 type <integer_type 0x7ffff6c25000 sizetype> constant 32> vs. <pointer_type 0x7ffff6a813f0 type <record_type 0x7ffff6a81348 quantum_reg_node TI size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6c0be10 constant 128> unit-size <integer_cst 0x7ffff6c0be28 constant 16> the former is subsetted by a COMPONENT_REF to eventually <pointer_type 0x7ffff6e752a0 type <record_type 0x7ffff6e751f8 quantum_reg_node VOID align:8 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 structural-equality pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff6e752a0>> unsigned DI so we have basically MEM<ptr + off> vs. MEM<ptr>.member-with-off. That's indeed a case where we maybe like to avoid applying this fix, but maybe only when strict-aliasing is in effect.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 13:18 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-02-09 9:24 [Bug target/113847] New: " fkastl at suse dot cz 2024-02-09 11:13 ` [Bug target/113847] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-10 17:04 ` fkastl at suse dot cz 2024-02-12 9:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-12 13:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-02-12 14:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-12 14:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-12 15:30 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-03-07 20:40 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-07 7:45 ` [Bug target/113847] [14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-113847-4-yOqRtXs2oO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).