From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A91173858CDB; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:41:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A91173858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710873688;
	bh=rrNpHJbSfsiuY/TLDG1hsM677iJkIFOXgmWmBrxSD74=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Nzzy/HsFg5OiYHu2rovMcAbr4gitDEFM9laq5WiLDtjYJLD75EdQ7llrdiktmGluQ
	 /LGyxXUU81YWIvDz0cxKzFm1G7R84PFVADNvFf++9QSOwfmmwwn5YXUJnTiIJCF3w/
	 pqxeYGCCrXCDOlCubo3moQ+/lNDzfIkwgv++J35M=
From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on
 x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:41:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at ucw dot cz
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113907-4-lC5LSTdxYV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113907

--- Comment #64 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> ---
> Are you going to apply this patch, even if it just helps partially with s=
ome
> tests and not others?
I think we should fix this completely, since it is source of very
suprising bugs.  I discussed it with Martin (since he is maintaining the
jump functions) and he will add comparator for them, so we can plug this
bug completely.  If we have operator=3D on functions, we can use it at the
spot I am comparing value ranges.=20

There is also a need to compare loop structures.   Seems I have testcase
now too (triggering peeling on miscomputed upper bound on iteration
count). Will attach it after cleaning up.=