From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 597CD385783C; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 03:14:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 597CD385783C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707880443;
	bh=a9oZ+fB82s5bSGimoylKr0TO81wOD0OnbT9Z4AoPJaE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YVZMmiDLut8fFKH6CmyIK4vPKNe4wwcLLIUMaG1OWERkOHP5h6G7X8MNVnpezKEfd
	 4ye7wCj8gmUu6WdJKqwfjmw4lF1j/ewlgyIQerTLmURshshgXipTUd5ktETc6AJy4L
	 WE7UAscDnAXcTSjD+cgQ93dzi9OvrvX8w2Qxjyy0=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113915] [14 regression] glibc miscompiled for armv7a
 since r14-4365-g0731889c026bfe
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 03:14:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113915-4-GdZ3pvSxos@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113915-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113915-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113915

--- Comment #5 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #0)
> glibc seems to go from 30 failing innocent tests (*) to over 400 between
> gcc-13 and gcc-14. Bisected to r14-4365-g0731889c026bfe which fixed PR111=
235.
>=20
> It's hard to know where to start with this. I'll try the usual bisection =
of
> objects and then pragmas although I fear the (necessary) complexities of
> glibc's build system may make my usual method tricky. We'll see...
>=20

Indeed, optimize("O0") pragma for _dl_find_object_update_1 in
dl-find_object.c/o avoids the crash. O1/O2 fail.=