From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BD42C385771F; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:21:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BD42C385771F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707895263;
	bh=LIEzu0T17CS2VLoR+9RSu2aIFjZur21yv0BN4caq1j0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=jklf3bFf5jId6iNojJRgqinmmcyQcCcGMX2t/zqBUlIW0uv9vrAA+oTW+Lo+ibfLp
	 QXyW8Q51UwMcqcuXBmlMJabb3Z8hrXopFS2jsMecp9flT7iabdjmlsmK4CnVJFTd84
	 8SC0TjJU080S0MoWliF1YcnwjEZbMZlTAqaDUHPI=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/113915] [14 regression] glibc's _dl_find_object_update_1
  miscompiled for armv7a since r14-4365-g0731889c026bfe
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:21:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-113915-4-ZI5C0z0abm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113915-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113915-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113915

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> cannot be conditional executed.

That is because most of the insn patterns in sync.md don't have=20
  [(set_attr "conds" "nocond")])

on them ....

Someone will have to submit that patch after testing, I don't have the
bandwidth to do it though.=