[Bug target/113953] New: Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

[Bug target/113953] New: Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

[sjames at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953

            Bug ID: 113953
           Summary: Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org, uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
            Blocks: 113932
  Target Milestone: ---

People are getting eager to require LRA. Please complete the port to LRA (see
PR113932) by dropping -mlra and always using it.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113932
[Bug 113932] [meta-bug] Targets which should be ported to LRA

[Bug target/113953] Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

[sjames at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-09-19
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

[Bug target/113953] Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

[sjames at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |stefansf at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
ping

[Bug target/113953] Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953

--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
<stefansf@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09a52cf036ba8f2fa7b60b18ba58ca17ffa1b146

commit r15-3733-g09a52cf036ba8f2fa7b60b18ba58ca17ffa1b146
Author: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf@gcc.gnu.org>
Date:   Fri Sep 20 13:53:08 2024 +0200

    s390: Remove -m{,no-}lra option

    Since the old reload pass is about to be removed and we defaulted to LRA
    for over a decade, remove option -m{,no-}lra.

    PR target/113953

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            * config/s390/s390.cc (s390_lra_p): Remove.
            (TARGET_LRA_P): Remove.
            * config/s390/s390.opt (mlra): Remove.
            * config/s390/s390.opt.urls (mlra): Remove.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * gcc.target/s390/TI-constants-nolra.c: Removed.
            * gcc.target/s390/pr79895.c: Removed.

[Bug target/113953] Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

[stefansf at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953

Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.

[Bug target/113953] Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

[segher at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953

--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Heh, I thought you forgot the manual, but -mlra apparently never was mentioned
in there anyway :-)

Thanks for the help pulling GCC kicking and streaming into the 21st century!

[Bug target/113953] Finish LRA transition for s390 by removing -mlra

[stefansf at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113953

--- Comment #5 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> Heh, I thought you forgot the manual, but -mlra apparently never was
> mentioned
> in there anyway :-)

Uff you almost had me there, i.e., if it had been documented I
might/probably/maybe have missed it ;-)  Thanks for double checking!