From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7A36C3857BBC; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 02:17:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7A36C3857BBC
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708136233;
	bh=+weddUSrjs6Uu2hLXN4HhplttPe9NioFiDyphfYdZu0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BRsbb5YB0cQTmVbRPiHpIRa7C4bJfN3mWZL9ovNEhBLtwyssyAE+Wi9fjDmFH9CF+
	 u61sC8Bo5qjlELeDK0JCedWG0EvX4xxEpk4ncjOFPvbcB236dYhnZLZKGo+qjbAG08
	 Z3mOj+Mux4HcD2Xt/tJLE1Si2K+hLvTf96k1kwU0=
From: "harald at gigawatt dot nl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/113959] Optimize `__builtin_isnan(x) ||
 __builtin_isinf(x)` to `__builtin_isfinite(x)`
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 02:17:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: harald at gigawatt dot nl
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-113959-4-pipGYktuRz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113959

Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |harald at gigawatt dot nl

--- Comment #2 from Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> ---
See also bug #66462: the code currently generated is wrong under
-fsignaling-nans, a patch has been posted to fix that, and had then been
forgotten. The patch may possibly improve codegen regardless of
-fsignaling-nans.=