From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6EA21385EC57; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 22:16:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6EA21385EC57
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708208179;
	bh=8JPD8Kl/gCEZXHYKaGUkaowAIr4aIKcVrZmHm4ls/GY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=isJ7w0TpOxcS7+Fpvl7qIiv+7UdNcVaso0EXI1d1SLvvsngdDSZ+aGOZJsMWsPQr2
	 zsfcWS7771yjtqDBg5KiLLitvwRFyqnVNIw8kqTJTZv7R7GFFil8lol7yLtn0buPCY
	 Gei8iNtqbmUBW16RGdt5haWUWOy1KbNKpbPdIeKA=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/113970] [14 Regression] pch/system-{1,2}.C fails on darwin
 after r14-8987-gdd9d14f7d53
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 22:16:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-113970-4-5N6wfHL1q2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113970

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
If I read this correctly, it is the debug info that is different rather than
the code itself being different?=