From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 92ABA3857C46; Wed,  6 Mar 2024 20:23:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 92ABA3857C46
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709756595;
	bh=ZdhX2T55jppMFc4u99AGvO3wGpsThubadfj/CqjyWXc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZcX47nt3mhQCEu4lhw+pwKH4z+GjJmxziGzHgWVJ4LYndDTrEszWEadhc9TGMNCIC
	 lB4T2BgP7UjeGWWUMyiBGkyfsPnI4ys0VlJD+h9iWS51qecyDeeCKl1tOZ37kf/uml
	 w1J2Mx/tzD6hWDknjNaiQ31Uh8H1yrTenPjp/5NU=
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/113970] [14 Regression] pch/system-{1,2}.C fails on darwin
 after r14-8987-gdd9d14f7d53
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 20:23:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-113970-4-DwdHflOdIE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113970

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Should we close this as fixed then?=