From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7959E3858D32; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:10:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7959E3858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708416626;
	bh=fKpjS5dgvCsfcwvyEdEFyB9G1TdvYb6pIvUkQJSPnj4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Wtxxvob2gCwow3rF+pe2z7P6KnVQHK7YXQ7t1uLrOyJkA6bIESfGe2UlScy/1Hpgv
	 Mz48K868ppi83R60rSo3ioNzMSe1hkbDlwYhtmGk7HIU7TUl1YLf0j4J5hUYr9oYZ+
	 hjK76QCb2EObXpwyHKanKrm6I9wJedJO6tzMhw3s=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/113996] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE with LTO at -O2 and
 above with some Ada code
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:10:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, lto, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-113996-4-5XoAZMDtMs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-113996-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-113996-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113996

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |lto

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You could also try whether -fwhole-program instead of -flto reproduces the
issue.=