From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 979D33858D28; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:18:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 979D33858D28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1708460304; bh=eVnDCRX07Ra2pZ0K+JY6Bd3xV+Gt0RrzUu8vSXapuAo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uK+Wk8enS+vpH2O8EA/ULBnXmeEcawrR+qOuKGZMY4ApDowbpz+U5uWA6QiJBSb9w x8X22DHVxepzAxgNiwF03EtIGOlD9Ygrw/XhL1M4fUPios3EkvgPboRidkRuie4UC7 RmDw2HXkRFBCelqhTtREWUCk6xkXnyAZ8MIXnWwU= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/114018] std::nexttoward is not implemented for C++23-FP-Types Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 20:18:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114018 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2024-02-20 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't think that's right, we don't have any std::nexttoward for those typ= es at all, irrespective of what glibc has. IIRC this was noted as missing when Jakub implemented the types.=