From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 31BEC385782D; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:02:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 31BEC385782D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710352979; bh=lZqKAO4FrYtzn/Dtx5CorQbNU2n6ciGKIAnGttfwU2Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=okrCteotg3rtF9QT4Kv5xo4cz267/36/zxeUrkDlRnBssTCUMIaJcpxiwdD3yUWbj VW6s8zb7Mn5oGu07XRFwWTam50MBHlkZjkubgys7LaXqWVixBKjx7bALG8pCBJyFge KSfSsSEMzoGKyUWrL5GbZH1dvVS+JsF/jSijOFSU= From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/114023] complex part%ref of complex named constant array cannot be used in an initialization expression. Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 18:02:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114023 Jerry DeLisle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-13 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- Steve, Anuj is interested in digging in on this one. This will be a learning experience.=