From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B58013858C52; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 15:51:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B58013858C52 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710604319; bh=xhbZnF/o4mtR6izT96Zw13clFDllkJoYmoehDYSuGHY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NS2XpwC8Mru2HPYDzbwnpz2VnGQhqRkN4d+GAmky4rMF2uMrLWU4rK8q5FusPcm8D P5KkH0lCPE4jKcMkdw4hZiAPERQuY/GTGEgOTfL0gVOsC+Xrk0jtejvA3wv8418sEJ tjBbn6WuRgTsvIlBKiEyBRNKdY2vUOQpuveTd8wY= From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/114049] gcc.dg/framework-1.c FAILs with Xcode 15.3 beta 3 Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 15:51:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114049 Iain Sandoe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2024-03-16 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- according to information from the Apple OSS folks, the Kernel.framework is/= was (never) intended to be used as a regular framework. [This was news to me, FWIW, and it does seem a somewhat odd situation, since it's wrapped up in a= ll the necessary machinery which makes it look like it should work]. .... anyway .... What we want from this test is that a suitable framework is found in /System/Library/Frameworks when the user has also given a local framework p= ath (-F.). What we want to avoid is the test regressing because of incidental SDK chan= ges (like unguarded Apple Black usage) - so we have picked the kernel framework= and a suitable low-complexity header. At present, I am thinking that IOkit/IOReturn.h might be a suitable substit= ute - but that needs to be checked across the range of OS versions supported.=