From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C30A23858D3C; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:11:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C30A23858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713276668;
	bh=GllcOFtUdHKCRo4hmCHMhBj2so5tg5IARY1pEP1qk7M=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=SHHStVY6OW7KctxuFTN2BG4Y9YvpstnnulteynkOCavbyHn8MZetlUeX1RH/fZMx1
	 jC9TBEc9gI+0C//idhC2hU5FPcbRiGqVSE8GfhWTgmc0uPjI0Ly+lTBoKueLcUh5eT
	 vN58LVe+NgKFQMutLilRa5loZGxmPBNf2PvgWM28=
From: "vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/114050] Inconsistency in double/float constant evaluation
 between 32 and 64 bit
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:11:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-114050-4-y9hVaPGMKq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114050-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114050-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114050

Vincent Lef=C3=A8vre <vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot =
net

--- Comment #12 from Vincent Lef=C3=A8vre <vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net> -=
--
(In reply to S=C3=B8ren J=C3=A6ger Hansen from comment #10)
> -fexcess-precision=3Dfast it is for now then, thanks again for fast feedb=
ack.

-fexcess-precision is unrelated. Its goal is to choose whether GCC conforms=
 to
the standard, i.e. reduces the precision for assignments and casts (*only* =
in
these cases, thus constants are not concerned), or generates faster but
non-conforming code.=