From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 175213858D1E; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:14:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 175213858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708798445;
	bh=1KGBZ9bu4TJKZRp8BYaAA1KLL1rvvA8OkR/d/VfACNY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=I2Mj2yvc76ZRlHPqwqyi6I/h/V9HLBpLHRokxOZXinxF8A99TkPHACYvFHVqvJhRH
	 v8f2oM1J1cIyr7kthjLJgEQW0Zp+KsOYmvUkBt66qT2O6FG0AI3eiy/WK9+VAa1Jnl
	 UtAhjxoMQMTrEgLzYNP08zNZxvcIqeK8tx9WgGWQ=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114090] [13/14 Regression] forwprop -fwrapv
 miscompilation
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 18:14:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-114090-4-KIS6KOLeFV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114090-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114090-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114090

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-02-24
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There most likely should be this check added:
ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && !TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type)=