From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 40B853858D35; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 19:29:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 40B853858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708889382;
	bh=5nzRM7ji3/5mMwFzkERMyvEYreFr6g3mvYfX8HepH9E=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=oLwLlXcEq97Rbq07JXmlXHlN6K78pS+uVYrzzJdlyO2wn+iqAHoq4fPtgECQpBm3C
	 472reNVZpFEU1reDAuXvqf85whJI5M7XugYDX5UZEgH05EaVJOBSZkH6Xitnlxe8W/
	 0f/SJB6ms0hrAs3bB61QNMv3JuevvEhsqERoSr5A=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114100] [avr] Inefficient indirect addressing on Reduced
 Tiny
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 19:29:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity everconfirmed bug_status
 cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-114100-4-ide3hOZXh8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114100-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114100-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114100

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-02-25

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. One way of improving this is to slightly increase the cost of the
indirect addressing with offset for these cores.=