public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "g.peterhoff@t-online.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libquadmath/114140] different results for std::fmin/std::fmax and quadmath fminq/fmaxq if one argument=signaling_NaN
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 01:55:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-114140-4-xTZJ5yGK8G@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-114140-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114140
--- Comment #13 from g.peterhoff@t-online.de ---
> The cppreference page is wrong.
But then *all* of your implementations for fmin/fmax (float, double, long
double, std::floatN_t) would be wrong, because they give exactly the results as
described on cppreference.
Is this really the case (which I don't believe)? And if so, that still doesn't
solve the original problem: std::math-functions and quadmath-functions *must*
of course return the same results - no matter which implementation is correct.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-28 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 21:09 [Bug libquadmath/114140] New: quadmath fminq/fmaxq with signaling_NaN not work g.peterhoff@t-online.de
2024-02-27 22:14 ` [Bug libquadmath/114140] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27 22:20 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27 22:36 ` [Bug middle-end/114140] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27 22:40 ` [Bug middle-end/114140] fmin/fmax " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27 22:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27 22:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-28 0:59 ` [Bug middle-end/114140] different results for std::fmin/std::fmax and quadmath fminq/fmaxq if one argument=signaling_NaN g.peterhoff@t-online.de
2024-02-28 1:02 ` [Bug libquadmath/114140] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-28 1:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-28 1:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-28 1:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-28 1:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-28 1:55 ` g.peterhoff@t-online.de [this message]
2024-02-28 2:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-28 8:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-28 11:36 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-28 12:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-114140-4-xTZJ5yGK8G@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).