From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AF1C83858401; Fri,  1 Mar 2024 09:15:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AF1C83858401
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709284545;
	bh=XfNsiUVkiC3yB98IBRJKDP7ANjNipC1YVHa3IEzreDk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=EP1b38SF7K4t6GX91h9nCI4C4dA+fHPaTyCM/ysrhPuBJ7uOD+7ucsTBEuNo2r0wv
	 u8W+Ucs/oV9uZi6Zb2C6KiRu4u+ccyFvbgC19MBxWOVHgIBiRR9UFzK6roJH+Cc9T8
	 DdjBbCBLfV+8U7LOjh3+cbh26P4/D4gk698YQy24=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/114141] ASSOCIATE and complex part ref when associate
 target is a function
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 09:15:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114141-4-uaAJNsdxAm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114141-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114141-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114141

--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #11)
...snip...
> I know you had some ASSOCIATE patches in the works, and
> certainly do not want to interfere.  Do you want to
> incorporate my patch or some variation into your work?
> I'm hoping to take a stab at the issue Jerry raised=20
> with parentheses this weekend.

Hi Steve,

Interference was not what I had in mind :-)

I was thinking of breaking the patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2024-January/060092.html in two; the
first to deal with derived type functions and the second for class function=
s.
Your patch for this PR would sit nicely in the first.

Cheers

Paul=