From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4E4D73858C53; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:33:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E4D73858C53
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709231632;
	bh=dX+Git29kqusQbHnGny2R1KpJd5kaLasR5UdMo/Qf/c=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Nr5rD4zjK/UHe6SjTHWoEGGAH24o5ylXua6TTzx9JXS9KtM1jsjrEMFZPRfOOtPbW
	 0wqNrJEo/k4Gb31r96jqQz/dimf511DCQ8/duE4IC8CJeh0jzC/Kx/6qR5MvcxlVVh
	 j/i4NA4NUq02qr3E/0uUiBaF6x/KkBg3JgMu96aU=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/114141] ASSOCIATE and complex part ref when associate
 target is a function
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:33:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_status cc cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-114141-4-wdsRcVzNUg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114141-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114141-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114141

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
                 CC|                            |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-02-29

--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #9)
> --- snip ---
> > % gfcx -o z a.f90
> > a.f90:5:6:
> >=20
> >     5 |       x%im =3D 42
> >       |      1
> > Error: 'x' at (1) associated to expression cannot be used in
> > a variable definition context (assignment)
> >=20
> > Mikael, thanks for the feedback.  I'll see if I can fix
> > the parentheses case this weekend.
>=20
> This is definitely a 42 case, which is why I had three '?' in my reply.
>=20
> And if you understand this, you are OK in my book. :)

BTW Both nagfor and ifort compile the testcase without complaint.

Your fix is closely related to my patch for not-yet-parsed function selecto=
rs.

Cheers

Paul=