From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B20FA3858C52; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:18:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B20FA3858C52 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1709119139; bh=yZZy2dcLSteRNRstX7I4zmtDbAcAaTEQ/FTI3uC0Tfo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UqvFyD2mb3Sc3a+tTgK1L2IYOYW7N+iMfeM/L+bCipJBa50qJGqg+UnzRJJJPBPIY a+U0BHoZGKP4AT8ZEgIagj1/ah5faFTR5u0uURohFDt4UmKjg9tl3Hfc/wlqDb4O+1 BZKfXGMQ6gP8AxFfjVGmKl1+moL++N6U6cG2NQYo= From: "victor.dyachenko at protonmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/114147] tuple allocator-extended constructor requires non-explicit default constructor Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:18:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: victor.dyachenko at protonmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114147 --- Comment #2 from __vic --- Shouldn't this be added? template::value, _T1, _T2> =3D= true> explicit _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR tuple(allocator_arg_t __tag, const _Alloc& __a) : _Inherited(__tag, __a) { }=